Our culture is obsessed with “big.” In so many ways it seems,
“size does matter.” Often the crudest anecdotes adapted by any culture “expose”
the values of that culture. Accompanying our obsession with “big,” can be an
unhealthy obsession with growth. The human growth hormone (HGH) and the performance-enhancing
drug scandals in the modern world of sports are highly symbolic of this. This obsession
with “big” and “growth” has plagued the church. At church leadership
conferences, megachurches are highlighted as the model to strive for. In many of these circles, the first
question a pastor gets asked is, “How many attend your church?” The answer to
that question, depending on who else is in the room, determines that pastor’s
place in the assumed but unspoken pecking order of ecclesial significance.
Study after study shows that the universal church is indeed growing
rapidly. This is not surprising. What is surprising is that the reason for the
growth is not because of megachurches, but because of thousands, and perhaps
millions of small churches around the world! Christian Swartz wrote, “The stats
tell us that ten smaller churches of 100 people will accomplish way more than
one church of 1000.” [1] Specifically, this means that far more people
are reached with the Good News and become followers of Jesus through small
churches. The explosion of the church in China and many other nations are due
to small house churches proliferating. In
observing this, Karl Vater writes that “there are few better ways to invest in
the advancement and promotion of the kingdom… than by multiplying, encouraging, and equipping healthy local small churches.”[2]
LIFE ON THE EDGE AND LIMINALITY
LIFE ON THE EDGE AND LIMINALITY
Why are small churches generally more effective? One reason is the “liminality factor.”[3]
“Liminality” has to do with being in the arena of risk, vulnerability, and
disorientation. The term literally is a description of the passage of life for youth
in tribal cultures, where they are taken into extreme conditions and taught to
survive, feeling left to fend for themselves. This process prepares them to emerge
into adulthood. Liminality is not the place we would naturally choose to be, but
God often takes us there. In liminality, our very survival seems at stake and
we feel desperate. It is a place of utter dependency while requiring us to give
everything we have. Liminality is often where small congregations find
themselves. When congregations are in this place, it involves more “buy-in” at
a grass roots level. I am intrigued by the high ratio of people who attend VEV
who are meaningfully involved and engaged. It is a ratio that far exceeds the North American average, where 80 percent of the work is done by 20 percent
of the people (often called the 80/20 ratio). At VEV, it’s more like 80/80.
In megachurches, commitment can be minimal. This is because
people can slip in and out anonymously. They can depend on a multiple paid
staff to meet the functioning needs of the church. Research bears this out. An
online article sent to me by Rick Hiebert cites a Duke University Study that
indicates that megachurches have less involved members per capita than small
churches.[4]
Of course, there are deeply committed disciples in both big and small churches.
God can use a megachurch to get the attention of a city or culture and they can
often be a wonderful resource to many smaller churches around them. Yet,
overall, this seems to be the exception more than the rule.
CROWD OR COMMUNITY?
CROWD OR COMMUNITY?
It’s hard to be anonymous in a smaller church. Mind you, the
Christian faith was never designed for anonymity. I think the greatest metaphor
for the church is “family” which means a place where you are known and loved. By
“family,” we do not merely mean the traditional “nuclear family” but rather a
larger extended family – a family of multiple generations including cousins,
uncles, aunties, grandparents as well as parents, brothers, and sisters. God is
still “the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob!”
Crowds come and go. I’ve lived long enough to know that the
right kind of technology and marketing can draw a big crowd, but, Jesus never
seemed that impressed with crowds. He often deliberately tried to reduce their
size by saying some really hard things.[5]
It was because he wanted disciples, not fans. He wanted a family, not crowds.
He knew crowds could boost someone’s ego but still leave them very lonely.
METRICS FOR GROWTH...?
METRICS FOR GROWTH...?
Having said all that, I have come back from sabbatical with
a longing for growth, both in my own life and the life of our church family. In
fact, to not want growth is not healthy. But, what do I mean by “growth?” I
mean growth in the most holistic sense of the word. I mean growing like Jesus
did – “in mind, body, love for God, and love for people” (see Luke
2:52).
How can we grow like that? How can we be more conversant
with Scripture, with history, and with our current culture, so that we can
better live the story we love to tell? How can we make sure that we’re taking
good care of our bodies, including nutrition, exercise, and rest, so that we
can offer them as a daily living sacrifice to God (Romans
12:1)? How can we grow in relational and emotional health and in our
capacity to love God and neighbour? How can we learn to be more comfortable in our
own skin and to live out of our true selves in Christ - not out of false religious
selves? How can we mature in our capacity to be lovingly patient with each
other, to work out our differences, to disagree respectfully, and communicate
lovingly? How can we grow in our capacity to celebrate children, the poor, the
marginalized, and the invisible ones? How can we grow in our capacity to love
and include those who are different than us? How could we extend welcome to the
displaced and marginalized refugees fleeing to our city from war-torn nations?
As a community, how can we help each other grow? How can we hold
one another in loving accountability, not for a “performance review,” but to help
each other reach towards our God-given dreams? How can we help each other discover,
develop, and deploy our spiritual gifts? How can we grow in our church/parent partnership
to make disciples of our children? How can we be intergenerational and include
our children and youth more in the story?
How can we be a blessing and love our neighbours by being a loving
presence? How could we develop a greater sense of "place," through initiatives like our "Let's Grow Together" community garden? How can we increase our radical
welcome so that people join our community of faith, organically and naturally,
adding to our beautiful mosaic?
How could we multiply so that there are dozens of more
congregations like ours throughout greater Vancouver that are still relating to
each other in mutual love and care? How could we develop leaders and teams for
these congregations? How could we work with our other Vineyard congregations
and church plants in the city to do so? How could we grow by entering into a deeper level of doing
justice and loving mercy? What are our next steps in our journey of mutual
healing with our First Nations friends in Lower Post?
So, you see, growth is important. However, let’s use
questions like these for our measuring stick. Perhaps you can add some questions of your
own! The Good News is that we're observing encouraging signs of this kind of
growth – in our community and in our larger Vineyard family.
[1]
Karl Vaters, “Your Small Church is Big,” Leadership
Magazine, Spring 2015, page 58. In this article, the author quotes a study
by Ed Stetzer and Christian Swartz.
[2]
Ibid.
[3]
Alan Roxburgh discusses this concept in his book, The Sky is Falling: Leaders Lost in Transition.
[4] “Megachurches
Have Less Involved Members than Small Churches, [Duke University] Study Finds.”
(Huge thanks to Rick Hiebert for sending this to me.)
[5]
See for example, John
6:61-71.